Questions on “The New Precision Journalism”: 1.) Because a journalist can look at one statistic or piece of data and come up with a completely different outcome than another journalist, how can one do his or her best to analyze data in a way that reflects all sides of a certain topic? 2.) When adjusting for inflation, how often does the task need to be done, and how can one understand when and how it needs to be adjusted?
On “Class Matters”: I do agree with the New York Times’ argument about class in the modern debate about income inequality, for the most part. To be completely honest, I have never been incredibly interested or knowledgeable about math in general, let alone the math that is involved in economic structures. So, as a result, my opinion really means nothing at this point. Still, the way class is set up now is much different than it was years ago. My dad, a 76-year-old code enforcement officer, grew up in a time where the classes were extremely separated. His family was as poor as it could be, and my dad understood the importance of hard work. He built up enough money to move into what would formerly be called the “middle class”. Today, though the lines are blurred, the top of the food chain and the bottom of it are still polar opposites. The rich continue to get richer, while the poor do just the opposite. The middle, on the other hand, has split into many different sectors that can be classified by many factors other than simply money or material wealth. Still, I do agree that a person’s standing on the spectrum at birth determines at least a part of what his or her income will be later in life. At the same time, the American economic system is fluid to a point, so that same person could move up or down on the spectrum depending on connections, work ethic, and sheer luck.
Interview Subject:
Jenny Ridyard is a woman in her mid-50s who works at 7Hills Homeless Shelter in Fayetteville. Once homeless herself, Ridyard now works as one of the main data workers at the shelter. While her salary at 7Hills is not extravagant by any means, her husband’s disability checks and the family’s frugality has given them the opportunity to live relatively comfortably.
“All I need is a bed, clothes, car, food, and I’m good,” Ridyard said. “This shirt is two dollars, (these pants) are two dollars, these bracelets and everything are one dollar. I get everything from thrift stores.”
While Ridyard’s job description isn’t on the OES database, Community and Social Service Specialists make $27,980 a year in Arkansas. One could assume that’s about what Ridyard makes.
“People don’t need to get all the fancy stuff and the name brands,” Ridyard said. “Save, save, save. I’ve been on the other side where you don’t have anything at all. It changed my perspective, living out in the woods with nothing.”
Andrew –
I need you to put your name on the blog posts. This helps me keep things straight.
Where are the graphics? I asked that you post the following graphics:
Data: Finish Task #2, Poverty Charts
–Statewide trends for Arkansas.
–Northwest Arkansas counties
–Statewide trends for female households
–Northwest Arkansas counties female households.
Blog comments
Your question: “1.) Because a journalist can look at one statistic or piece of data and come up with a completely different outcome than another journalist, how can one do his or her best to analyze data in a way that reflects all sides of a certain topic?”
— Can you provide an example? If I gave you a data sheet and told you to calculate the averages the columns, two different reporters would come up with different answers? I hope not!
This is where transparency in our methods come in. We tell readers what we did and show them the data. This allows readers to retrace our steps – which is mildly terrifying – but it can allow others to stand on our shoulders and advance the work.
Great question on inflation. ” When adjusting for inflation, how often does the task need to be done, and how can one understand when and how it needs to be adjusted?”
–I always adjust for inflation when I am doing a historical analysis over a period of a decade or more. Or I adjust when there was a period of high inflation, such as the 1970s and early 1980s.
On Class Matters, I found this to be very interesting: “the American economic system is fluid to a point, so that same person could move up or down on the spectrum depending on connections, work ethic, and sheer luck.”
I want to know more about what accounts for that fluidity.
This Jenny Ridyard interview looks really promising. We do need to find out her salary to make sure she would fall into the category of the “working poor.”
–Poverty thresholds:
The actual poverty thresholds vary with the makeup of the family. In 2015, the weighted average poverty threshold for a family of four was $24,257; for a family of nine or more people, the threshold was $49,177; and for one person (see Unrelated individuals), it was $12,082. Poverty thresholds are updated each year to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). Thresholds do not vary geographically. (For more information, see “Income and poverty in the United States: 2015.”)
https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/working-poor/2015/home.htm#unrelatedindividual
Weighted Average Poverty
Thresholds in 2015 by Size of
Family
(Dollars)
One person 12,082
Two people 15,391
Three people 18,871
Four people 24,257
Five people 28,741
Six people 32,542
Seven people 36,998
Eight people 41,029
Nine people or more 49,177
Source: U.S. Census Bureau.
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.pdf
https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-poverty-thresholds.html